Furnace Brook Lab Report
Introduction: First you test the PH of the water at Furnace Brook Creek. Find what’s a healthy enough PH for the micro-invertebrates. The dissolved nitrogen and oxygen compound were to be intended on. Sampling the water would tell us the population of each species available in the water under these conditions.
Research Question: Which location would have a healthier environment, low flow water and silt or very rocky and high flow water?
Hypothesis: In fast moving waters there isn’t enough time for any species alive to absorb or catch the nutrients or daily necessities also the fact there is rocks or rough patches makes it even harder to catch them. Versus slow moving waters and non-rocky.
Variable Identification:
Controlled variable
|
Method of controlled variable
|
Location 1
|
Location 2
|
clear
|
swampy
|
not so deep
|
deep
|
rocky
|
silt
|
fast flow rate
|
slow flow rate
|
Experimental Setup: This lab was conducted at the creek, Furnace Brook, located behind Corcoran High School and continues through Elmwood Park. Materials that were used were a kick-net, plastic paint tray, meter stick, tape measure, stop watch, golf ball, dissolved oxygen tablets, pH tablets, two vials varying in size, a water thermometer, and a calculator.
Procedure:
1. Get into groups of 3 or 4
2. Find an appropriate site to sample in the river
3. Using a LaMotte kit filled with the following
Ph tablets
DO tablets
Secchi disc
Thermometer
Chart with turbidity, ph and do readings
2 vials
Find a location and keep track of the coordinates
A huge net
Water boots
4. Fill up cup with water to check turbidity. Then using same water check temperature using thermometer wait to read until the strip turns green.
5. Put water is the small glass bottle and drop 1 do tablet into bottle. Invert bottle 10 times or until the pill is completely dissolved. Record color of water.
6. Gather water in long bottle, drop a pH tablet in then follow same instructions given in #5.
Data:
Total biomass in sample (g)
| ||
Stream A
|
Stream B
| |
stone fly
|
5
|
3
|
midge larvae
|
8
|
20
|
caddisfly
|
13
|
19
|
scuds
|
16
|
28
|
Results:
The light green color represents the second data collection. And the dark green color represents the first of data collection.
Discussion: TURBIDITY OF 0.
D.O. OF 6PPM
Ph OF 7
Temperature of 8 Degrees
Evaluation: Some things that could have affected the experiment would have been location; how high or low flow ate down the stream and time of day that the data was taken. Or even the season, or even the speed of the water. What the environment around the water is already, and the acidity in the water already is. Also what human disturbances affected the water before testing. Or if we didn’t kick around the organisms in the water. Maybe the data we collected during the experiment would differ.
References – Macroinvertebrates - Environment." Environment. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2015.
I'm doing this one
ReplyDeletePlanning:
ReplyDeleteAspect 1 - Complete, clear research question and hypothesis
Aspect 2 - Not at all, the controlled variables chart has the water conditions, not controlled variables
Aspect 3 - Partial, incomplete procedure
Data Collection and Processing:
Aspect 1 - Partial, not all data is present
Aspect 2 - Not at all, no processed data
Aspect 3 - Not at all, no graph or processed data
Discussion, Evaluation, and Conclusion:
Aspect 1 - Not at all, no discussion present
Aspect 2 - Partial, states weaknesses, but not how to fix them
Aspect 3 - Not at all, no conclusion present
Comments - Missing a lot of aspects needed to get a good grade. To go deeper in depth on the information you have present might help as well. The controlled variable chart is messed up, as I stated in the assessment. Also an arrow, circle, or something like that on the picture of the map would be good.